Note! This blog contains highly controversial claims! Moreover, many of the views do not correspond to general scientific theories.
The articles here try to convince you why we humans should be called homo reliquiae instead of homo sapiens (wise). Homo reliquiae means a “surviving man”. We are not wise—sapiens—but just ancient remains and relics of our original species, homo heidelbergensis (bodoensis). This blog also tries to convince you that understanding ourselves is possible and that in addition to questions, there are also answers. After 20 years of studying, I have concluded that the emergence of modern humans +100.000 years ago virtually meant that we left behind, abandoned, and gave up [relinquere] a critical feature that used to make us mentally adults. My hypothesis proposes to limit the origin of modern humans to microevolutionary events. That means modern humans are not a new species, but a defective modification of Heidelberg man. Now all human adults are just overaged teenagers. Because of this, we can’t understand life and its various phenomena. I have no tools to prove this, but my articles offer interesting circumstantial evidence to support this hypothesis. I should point out that almost all of my arguments differ from the prevailing and paradigmatic views regarding man and development. Otherwise, I guess there would be no idea to present them.